I am very conflicted about the tattoo.
Because I'm a fashion
and corporate rebel, many are surprised there's not some ink lurking
under my R13 Jeans. But the fact is I don't have a tattoo, or multiple
piercings (only one hole in each ear, empty, stretched out from those
huge hoops of the '80s) or anything permanent, involving needles.

Oddly
enough, Jslow is also sans tattoos. I asked her why. "I knew my tastes
would change and I couldn't figure out the one thing I'd want to live
with forever."
When I was younger, and friends started getting
them, I'd hear the naysayers bray, "you'll regret that when you are
older" nonsense. And now, it's the older people that are getting them in
droves. And true confession here, I'm pondering FINALLY getting one,
but don't want to be a middle-aged cliche. So I asked my dear, tatted
friends Kelly (Kell) and Sharon (Shaz) why they got theirs, and how they
make them feel. Here are their stories:
Kell:
Got my first tattoo at 47. Got it on my trip to Greece. Always
fascinated with tattoos so thought 'what the fuck' I'm gonna do it.
Needless to say we were drunk at the time and all I got was a small blue
star on my lower back. It is true what they say once you get one it is
kind of addicting. About a year later I added more colorful stars. Then I
pondered the Giants tattoo (pictured right) for about a year. I knew
that I wanted to do it, but took me a year to decide what I wanted and
where I was going to put it. This tattoo really meant something to me
and I just wanted to put it where I would see it everyday, but not
necessarily everyone else.
I love my tattoos and am happy everyday when I look at them. I designed them and they make me feel just a bit more unique.
Shaz:
For my lotus tattoo, at left, the colors were chosen from an Asian art
book and the lotus symbolizes my dedication to the spiritual practice of
Yoga. It was done by an amazing artist named Cecilia at a Studio in the
Haight, around 2002 and the design was her creation.
I love this
tattoo and always will. It represents who I am. It flows down my pale
white calf in a bright and expressive way. It's a true expression of me.
What would Oprah say... my authentic self!!!
The "Blonde
Veronica", at the top of this post, was designed by Markie (Shaz's
husband) and executed on my 30th birthday. Tiffany and Ashley came with
me when I had it done and we laughed the whole time while I sweated and
bled under great pain. The location was strategically placed in an
unseen area. At the time I was blonde and this tattoo represented a
pretty amazing time in my life living and working in San Francisco. It's
very playful and cheeky with a retro spin! I've let this tattoo fade as
the lotus is more true to who I am now.
What
I love about both of their tattoo tales is that even the circumstances
surrounding how and why they got their tattoos is part of the story and
is so true to who they are and the spirit in which they live. They are
both two of the most "unique" and "authentic" ladies I know, and their
choice in tattoos reflects that.
A big part of me wants to take
the plunge. But like Jslow, my tastes do change and I want to make sure
I'll love it forever. But I also love that Shaz's Blonde Veronica faded
like an old pair of jeans, comfortable on her own skin.
When my husband read this post, he was horrified and texted me this:
"You're thinking of getting a tattoo? That is appalling."
I
got home and asked why. He said that he loved the fact that I didn't
bend to trends and was "a rebel in reverse" by NOT getting tattoos or
piercings when I was young, or now older. He does have a point as my way
of feeling unique is not to follow the norm. But what is the norm
anyway and really, who cares?
And still. I love seeing a
flamboyantly flowery tattoo poking out of the pin-striped sleeve of a
50-plus VP, or a tiger running down the thigh of the grandma doing
downward dog one mat over.
Should I give father time, and my own issues with "middle-age cliches" the finger and get one? I'm taking requests.
Source:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-mangin/our-tattoos-taboo-in-midd_b_5243726.html?utm_hp_ref=tattoo
Tattoo shops in Killeen used to be packed with customers, but artists say new Army regulations have dried up their business.
Tattoo
artist Jose Lagares says soldiers made up the majority of customers at
shops like his, but these days, it's mostly empty space.
The new regulations draw a clear line about tattoos.
• Tattoos are no longer allowed on the head and neck above the t-shirt
• Tattoos are not allowed on the wrists
• Full sleeve tattoos on arms and legs are no longer allowed.
• Any visible tattoos have to be less than two inches wide.
"We
were flooded with a lot of tattoos, big tattoos and then lately, it's
been dwindling down and in the past month or so it's pretty much died
out," he said.
And even if a soldier decides to get a tattoo, Lagares says, shops don’t make much profit on small tattoos.
"You go from $1,000 tattoo to now, maybe $100 on a tattoo," Lagares said.
Other artists say the new regulation is already cutting into their future business.
"Other
guys, we had scheduled months in advance that were coming home,”
Michael Sustaita said. “Now they're like ‘Hey I'm not going make it back
before that ban, so I'm not going to be able to do it.’"
These
artists say the military needs to modernize and realize that tattoos
aren't the taboo they once were. Now, these pieces can be art. To
veterans, they can be memorials.
"This is how they've learned to express their pain and tell their stories you know," Sustaita said.
Soldiers who violate the new rules could face administrative action or charges under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
The military says soldiers will be inspected once a year to see if any new tattoos violate the rules.
Old tattoos are grandfathered in under the old rules.
- See more at:
http://austin.twcnews.com/content/news/299196/killeen-tattoo-shops-hurting-under-new-army-regulations#sthash.GIqYiqGL.dpuf
Tattoo shops in Killeen used to be packed with customers, but artists say new Army regulations have dried up their business.
Tattoo
artist Jose Lagares says soldiers made up the majority of customers at
shops like his, but these days, it's mostly empty space.
The new regulations draw a clear line about tattoos.
• Tattoos are no longer allowed on the head and neck above the t-shirt
• Tattoos are not allowed on the wrists
• Full sleeve tattoos on arms and legs are no longer allowed.
• Any visible tattoos have to be less than two inches wide.
"We
were flooded with a lot of tattoos, big tattoos and then lately, it's
been dwindling down and in the past month or so it's pretty much died
out," he said.
And even if a soldier decides to get a tattoo, Lagares says, shops don’t make much profit on small tattoos.
"You go from $1,000 tattoo to now, maybe $100 on a tattoo," Lagares said.
Other artists say the new regulation is already cutting into their future business.
"Other
guys, we had scheduled months in advance that were coming home,”
Michael Sustaita said. “Now they're like ‘Hey I'm not going make it back
before that ban, so I'm not going to be able to do it.’"
These
artists say the military needs to modernize and realize that tattoos
aren't the taboo they once were. Now, these pieces can be art. To
veterans, they can be memorials.
"This is how they've learned to express their pain and tell their stories you know," Sustaita said.
Soldiers who violate the new rules could face administrative action or charges under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
The military says soldiers will be inspected once a year to see if any new tattoos violate the rules.
Old tattoos are grandfathered in under the old rules.
- See more at:
http://austin.twcnews.com/content/news/299196/killeen-tattoo-shops-hurting-under-new-army-regulations#sthash.GIqYiqGL.dpuf
Tattoo shops in Killeen used to be packed with customers, but artists say new Army regulations have dried up their business.
Tattoo
artist Jose Lagares says soldiers made up the majority of customers at
shops like his, but these days, it's mostly empty space.
The new regulations draw a clear line about tattoos.
• Tattoos are no longer allowed on the head and neck above the t-shirt
• Tattoos are not allowed on the wrists
• Full sleeve tattoos on arms and legs are no longer allowed.
• Any visible tattoos have to be less than two inches wide.
"We
were flooded with a lot of tattoos, big tattoos and then lately, it's
been dwindling down and in the past month or so it's pretty much died
out," he said.
And even if a soldier decides to get a tattoo, Lagares says, shops don’t make much profit on small tattoos.
"You go from $1,000 tattoo to now, maybe $100 on a tattoo," Lagares said.
Other artists say the new regulation is already cutting into their future business.
"Other
guys, we had scheduled months in advance that were coming home,”
Michael Sustaita said. “Now they're like ‘Hey I'm not going make it back
before that ban, so I'm not going to be able to do it.’"
These
artists say the military needs to modernize and realize that tattoos
aren't the taboo they once were. Now, these pieces can be art. To
veterans, they can be memorials.
"This is how they've learned to express their pain and tell their stories you know," Sustaita said.
Soldiers who violate the new rules could face administrative action or charges under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
The military says soldiers will be inspected once a year to see if any new tattoos violate the rules.
Old tattoos are grandfathered in under the old rules.
- See more at:
http://austin.twcnews.com/content/news/299196/killeen-tattoo-shops-hurting-under-new-army-regulations#sthash.GIqYiqGL.dpuf